🎧 3-Minute Audio Briefing
Listen to the summary
Should you become a manager? Our verdict is: it depends, with 72% confidence. This is one of the most consequential career decisions you'll make, and the answer hinges on self-knowledge, not ambition. Here's what most career advice gets wrong: management is not a promotion. It's a career change. You're not doing higher-level work in the same field — you're doing entirely different work. Your output shifts from tangible artifacts like code, designs, and reports to intangible outcomes like team performance, retention, and culture. That shift is energizing for some people and soul-crushing for others. Our scorecard weighs 8 factors. Organizational influence scores highest at 8 because a great manager genuinely multiplies team output. But daily satisfaction scores only 5 and stress scores only 4. The reality is 25 to 35 hours of meetings per week, constant context switching, emotional labor from managing underperformers and navigating conflicts, and political exposure that makes failure very public. The compensation case is real but nuanced. Management generally pays 15 to 40% more than IC roles at equivalent levels. But top IC tracks at large companies can match or exceed management pay. If money is your only reason, negotiate a raise or change companies instead. Three scenarios: best case, you discover genuine talent for coaching and team building, your team thrives, and within 2 years you're promoted to senior management with a 40% compensation increase. Realistic case, a difficult first year that gradually improves, with 15 to 25% more pay but a mix of fulfillment and frustration. Worst case, you take the role for the title, hate the daily reality, disengage, and after 18 months try to return to IC work only to find your technical skills have atrophied. Before deciding: shadow a manager for 2 weeks. Attend their meetings and one-on-ones. Then take on a tech lead role first as a reversible experiment. Read The Manager's Path by Camille Fournier for the most realistic guide to this transition.
Who Is This For?
✅ You should if…
- Individual contributors who genuinely enjoy mentoring, unblocking teammates, and building team culture
- Professionals in organizations where management is the only path to senior-level compensation and influence
- People with strong communication, conflict resolution, and organizational skills who find meetings energizing not draining
- Mid-career professionals who have hit a ceiling on their IC track and want broader organizational impact
- Leaders who are motivated by developing others' careers more than advancing their own technical skills
🚫 You should NOT if…
- Top performers who love deep technical work and would resent a calendar full of one-on-ones and status meetings
- People pursuing management primarily for the title or salary bump without understanding the daily reality
- Introverts who recharge alone and find constant interpersonal interaction exhausting rather than stimulating
- Professionals in organizations with a strong IC track that offers equivalent compensation and respect to management
Decision Scorecard
Pros & Cons
👍 Pros
Broader organizational impact
A great manager multiplies the output of an entire team. Instead of producing one person's work, you enable 5-15 people to do their best work — a fundamentally different scale of contribution.
Higher compensation ceiling in most organizations
Despite the growth of IC tracks, management still offers higher total compensation at most companies. The gap widens significantly at director and VP levels.
Develops universally transferable skills
Communication, conflict resolution, hiring, coaching, and strategic thinking transfer across industries. A great manager can move from tech to healthcare to finance.
Deeper understanding of business operations
Managers gain visibility into budgets, headcount planning, cross-functional dependencies, and company strategy that ICs rarely see. This perspective is valuable regardless of your next role.
You shape culture and careers
A good manager is often the most influential person in an employee's professional life. The ability to create environments where people thrive is deeply fulfilling for those motivated by service.
👎 Cons
Your output becomes intangible
You stop producing measurable artifacts: code, designs, reports. Your value is team performance, which is harder to quantify, slower to demonstrate, and more politically vulnerable.
Emotional labor is relentless
Managing underperformers, navigating team conflicts, delivering difficult feedback, and absorbing stress from above and below is draining in ways that technical work is not.
Calendar fragmentation destroys focus
Expect 25-35 hours per week in meetings: one-on-ones, team syncs, skip-levels, cross-functional alignment, planning, and reviews. Deep work time evaporates.
Career reversibility is difficult
After 2-3 years in management, returning to an IC role means competing with people who spent those years deepening their technical skills. The gap compounds painfully.
First-time managers receive inadequate training
Most organizations promote top ICs into management with zero training. The first year is painful: imposter syndrome, skill gaps, and learning entirely through mistakes.
Risks People Underestimate
The 'manager's schedule' destroys the 'maker's schedule.' If you currently cherish 4-hour blocks of uninterrupted focus, management will eliminate them entirely. This is not an adjustment — it's a lifestyle change.
Political exposure increases dramatically. As a manager, you're visible to leadership, responsible for team outcomes, and measured on metrics you can only influence indirectly. Failure is more public and more career-damaging.
The best ICs often make the worst managers because the skills are genuinely different. Excellence at doing the work does not predict excellence at enabling others to do the work.
3 Realistic Scenarios
🟢 Best Case
You discover a genuine talent for coaching and team-building. Within 2 years, your team's output, retention, and satisfaction metrics are in the top quartile. You're promoted to senior management, and your compensation increases 40% over your peak IC salary. You find managing people more fulfilling than individual contribution.
🟡 Realistic Case
You transition into management, find the first year difficult, and gradually develop competence. You enjoy some aspects like mentoring and strategic work but miss hands-on execution. Your compensation increases 15-25%. After 3 years, you're a solid middle manager who is neither miserable nor passionate about the role.
🔴 Worst Case
You accept a management role for the title and salary, quickly realize you dislike the daily reality of meetings, politics, and emotional labor. Your team senses your disengagement. After 18 months of mediocre performance reviews, you attempt to return to IC work but find your technical skills have atrophied and the market values you less than when you left.
Recommended Next Steps
Some links are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. We only recommend resources we'd use ourselves. Full disclosure.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do managers make more money than individual contributors?
Usually yes, especially above the mid-level. At senior levels, the gap can be 20-50%. However, top IC tracks at large tech companies (Staff/Principal engineer) can match or exceed management compensation.
Can I go back to an IC role after becoming a manager?
Yes, but it gets harder the longer you manage. After 2-3 years, your technical skills atrophy relative to peers who stayed on the IC track. Plan for 3-6 months of ramp-up if you switch back.
What makes a good first-time manager?
Empathy, active listening, comfort with ambiguity, willingness to have difficult conversations, and genuine interest in other people's growth. Technical excellence is helpful but insufficient.
How do I know if I'd be a good manager?
Ask yourself: do you enjoy mentoring? Do you find satisfaction in others' success? Do you handle conflict constructively? Do you communicate clearly under pressure? If yes to most, you have the raw material.
What's the hardest part of being a new manager?
The identity shift. You go from being valued for what you produce to being valued for what your team produces. Most first-time managers struggle with letting go of individual contribution.
Should I become a manager just for the salary increase?
No. The salary increase rarely compensates for the stress, emotional labor, and career risk if you're not genuinely motivated by the work. Negotiate IC-track raises or switch companies instead.
If You're in This Situation, Do This
🎯 If you're early-career
Focus on the "Who Should" criteria above. Your risk tolerance is higher and recovery time from a wrong move is shorter.
🏠 If you have dependents
Prioritize the financial factors in the scorecard. The "Realistic Case" scenario should be your planning baseline, not the best case.
⏰ If you're on a deadline
Skip straight to "Recommended Next Steps" and take the first action within 48 hours. Analysis paralysis is the biggest risk.
Sources & Assumptions
- Harvard Business Review: What Great Managers Do (2025)
- Gallup: State of the American Manager 2025
- Rands Leadership Slack Community Survey 2025
- Bureau of Labor Statistics: Management Occupations Outlook
- Camille Fournier: The Manager's Path (O'Reilly)