Our Verdict

Should I Get Certifications or Build Projects?

Depends

Confidence: 90% 5 min read Updated 2026-02-27

3-Minute Audio Briefing

Listen to the summary

0:000:00

Should I Get Certifications or Build Projects?? Our verdict is depends, with 90% confidence. In most modern hiring flows, practical projects carry more weight than certificates alone. This guide focuses on decision quality, not hype. We compare opportunity, execution friction, time-to-result, and long-term optionality using the same weighted framework used across the site. Most people choose based on emotion, trend pressure, or fear of missing out. That usually leads to inconsistent effort and weak outcomes. A stronger approach is to map your constraints first: available hours, current baseline skill, budget, and the timeline for visible results. Then pick the path you can sustain for at least twelve focused weeks, with a simple weekly cadence and clear checkpoints. If your goal is employability, prioritize practical outputs: projects, case studies, and concrete artifacts that prove capability. If your goal is career switching, prioritize role fit and job-market demand over abstract credentials alone. Keep the system simple: one primary learning track, one practice loop, and one feedback channel. Review progress every two weeks, remove low-value activities, and double down on methods that produce measurable improvement. Do not optimize for complexity. Start with fundamentals, then add depth only when your current workflow is stable and producing results. Use clear evidence to decide your next move: better output quality, faster delivery speed, stronger confidence, and better conversion in interviews or client conversations. Keep your scope intentionally narrow until completion becomes predictable, because completed practical work creates more value than partially finished breadth. Bottom line: choose the path you can execute consistently, measure honestly, and iterate deliberately.

Who Is This For?

You should if…

  • Career switchers building credibility in new domains
  • Learners deciding how to spend limited study hours
  • Candidates targeting portfolio-driven roles
  • Professionals needing stronger interview evidence
  • People balancing signaling and practical competence

You should NOT if…

  • People expecting one certificate to replace real skill
  • Learners avoiding public project work
  • Anyone with no role-specific target in mind
  • People who skip feedback and iteration
  • Those optimizing for badges over outcomes

Decision Scorecard

FactorWeightScoreWeighted
Hiring Signal Strength 8/10 7/10
Proof of Ability 10/10 9/10
Time ROI 8/10 8/10
Portfolio Relevance 9/10 9/10
Execution Difficulty 7/10 7/10
Long-Term Career Utility 8/10 8/10
Overall Score 81% (404/500)

Pros & Cons

Pros

Projects demonstrate real capability

Hiring teams can evaluate practical decisions, tradeoffs, and execution quality directly.

Certifications can support credibility

In some contexts, certificates help structure and baseline trust.

Projects improve interview performance

Concrete examples make behavioral and technical interviews stronger.

Projects compound publicly

A visible portfolio can attract inbound opportunities over time.

Best strategy can combine both

Targeted certifications plus strong projects often outperform either path alone.

Cons

Certificates can be overvalued

Many candidates have certificates, reducing differentiation if no proof of application exists.

Projects require deeper effort

Building useful artifacts takes planning, iteration, and communication discipline.

Poorly scoped projects underperform

Generic or unfinished work does not create strong hiring signal.

Certification costs can add up

Without execution, credential spending can have low return.

Portfolio maintenance is ongoing

Projects need updates and clearer storytelling as goals evolve.

Risks People Underestimate

Many roles ask for evidence of impact, not course completion volume.

Generic projects copied from tutorials rarely create differentiation.

Lack of project narrative weakens otherwise good technical work.

3 Realistic Scenarios

Best Case

You complete one relevant certification and ship three high-quality projects that clearly map to target job requirements, outcomes, and decision context.

Realistic Case

You prioritize projects first, then add selective certificates to fill gaps and improve signaling in recruiter screens and structured interviews.

Worst Case

You spend months collecting badges without shipping meaningful work, resulting in low confidence, weak proof, and poor hiring conversion rates.

Recommended Next Steps

Ad · Some links below are advertising (affiliate) links. If you use them, we may earn a commission. Our analysis is independent. Full disclosure.

Define your target role and list the top five skills employers repeatedly request in job descriptions.

Build two role-relevant portfolio projects with clear problem, method, and measurable outcome sections.

Use one selective certificate track only where it closes a concrete skill or signal gap.

Choose a targeted certification path -> (advertising link, opens in new tab)

Frequently Asked Questions

Do recruiters care about certifications?

Sometimes, but practical project evidence is usually more persuasive.

How many projects should I build?

Two to four strong projects usually outperform many shallow ones.

Can certificates help career switchers?

Yes, especially when paired with role-relevant project outcomes.

What makes a project credible?

Clear problem framing, method choices, measurable impact, and clean communication.

Should I publish projects publicly?

In most cases yes, unless data confidentiality prevents it.

Is a portfolio better than a resume?

You generally need both, but a strong portfolio can materially improve conversion.

If You're in This Situation, Do This

🎯 If you're early-career

Focus on the "Who Should" criteria above. Your risk tolerance is higher and recovery time from a wrong move is shorter.

🏠 If you have dependents

Prioritize the financial factors in the scorecard. The "Realistic Case" scenario should be your planning baseline, not the best case.

⏰ If you're on a deadline

Skip straight to "Recommended Next Steps" and take the first action within 48 hours. Analysis paralysis is the biggest risk.

Sources & Assumptions

  1. https://www.linkedin.com/business/talent/blog/talent-strategy/skills-based-hiring
  2. https://www.coursera.org/
  3. https://www.github.com/
  4. https://www.kaggle.com/

Related Decisions

Explore More Guides

Browse the Best Of hub or continue in Learning.